The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Five.

A forum for true blue Leinster supporters to talk about and support their team

Moderator: moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Twist
Mullet
Posts: 1311
Joined: September 14th, 2011, 2:33 am

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by Twist »

Logorrhea wrote:
curates_egg wrote:Does Sarries cheating and sanction mean we actually won?
There is no salary cap for any teams in the HEC so no cheating. They won it fair and square.
Part of the competition is that you have to qualify. They qualified illegally so they most certainly did not win fair & square

Aussiedub
Mullet
Posts: 1073
Joined: November 5th, 2007, 11:50 am
Location: Sydney

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by Aussiedub »

Logorrhea wrote:
curates_egg wrote:Does Sarries cheating and sanction mean we actually won?
There is no salary cap for any teams in the HEC so no cheating. They won it fair and square.
If they had abided by the salary cap in the Premiership they wouldn't have been able to put out the team they played against us - eg Liam Williams for example would have been unavailable
After showing Munster how to win a HC final in the first attempt we will now demonstrate how to retain the HC in the following season :-)

User avatar
Logorrhea
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4263
Joined: October 2nd, 2007, 1:20 pm
Location: D24

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by Logorrhea »

Aussiedub wrote:If they had abided by the salary cap in the Premiership they wouldn't have been able to put out the team they played against us - eg Liam Williams for example would have been unavailable
Twist wrote:Part of the competition is that you have to qualify. They qualified illegally so they most certainly did not win fair & square
Those rules are set by the premiership and they will be punished by the premiership. They are not rules set by Europe. They wont be found to have cheated in any European competition.

User avatar
LeinsterLeader
Mullet
Posts: 1700
Joined: May 23rd, 2010, 8:51 pm

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by LeinsterLeader »

I'd be grateful if someone could explain the following to me (as I can't get my head around it)......

If they are say 2m over the salary cap how do they they get back under the cap straightaway? or do they not have to do it straightaway, can they wait until the existing contracts finish and then be bound over to stay under the cap in future?

tingman
Knowledgeable
Posts: 393
Joined: January 12th, 2017, 2:10 pm

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by tingman »

LeinsterLeader wrote:I'd be grateful if someone could explain the following to me (as I can't get my head around it)......

If they are say 2m over the salary cap how do they they get back under the cap straightaway? or do they not have to do it straightaway, can they wait until the existing contracts finish and then be bound over to stay under the cap in future?
Open to correction here but my guess is they would be made rectify the situation with immediate effect - otherwise it would serve to compound what is now deemed
to be an unfair advantage.

User avatar
LeinsterLeader
Mullet
Posts: 1700
Joined: May 23rd, 2010, 8:51 pm

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by LeinsterLeader »

tingman wrote:
LeinsterLeader wrote:I'd be grateful if someone could explain the following to me (as I can't get my head around it)......

If they are say 2m over the salary cap how do they they get back under the cap straightaway? or do they not have to do it straightaway, can they wait until the existing contracts finish and then be bound over to stay under the cap in future?
Open to correction here but my guess is they would be made rectify the situation with immediate effect - otherwise it would serve to compound what is now deemed
to be an unfair advantage.
Okay, but any thoughts on how they might do that? would we we talking about terminating contracts?

User avatar
Dave Cahill
Gordon D'Arcy
Posts: 22641
Joined: January 24th, 2006, 4:32 pm
Location: None of your damn business
Contact:

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by Dave Cahill »

Even if they did cheat to get to the competition, AND the EPRC decide that they did, they'll just void their win - we won't be given it. Glasgow and Munster were equally damaged by their financial doping - Glasgow lost to them three times!
I have Bumbleflex

tingman
Knowledgeable
Posts: 393
Joined: January 12th, 2017, 2:10 pm

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by tingman »

LeinsterLeader wrote:
tingman wrote:
LeinsterLeader wrote:I'd be grateful if someone could explain the following to me (as I can't get my head around it)......

If they are say 2m over the salary cap how do they they get back under the cap straightaway? or do they not have to do it straightaway, can they wait until the existing contracts finish and then be bound over to stay under the cap in future?
Open to correction here but my guess is they would be made rectify the situation with immediate effect - otherwise it would serve to compound what is now deemed
to be an unfair advantage.
Okay, but any thoughts on how they might do that? would we we talking about terminating contracts?
Its being appealed but this is potentially a hornets nest - if a recent signing came in with them already deemed over the cap is this contract null & void?.....i'm happy to pass over to our learned legal friends!

User avatar
Dave Cahill
Gordon D'Arcy
Posts: 22641
Joined: January 24th, 2006, 4:32 pm
Location: None of your damn business
Contact:

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by Dave Cahill »

They'd simply have to keep to the terms of the players contracts but couldn't register them for any competitions. They would then most likely attempt to shift them out on loan if they could get someone to take on some of the cost. For example, when Finegan was (on loan) here Newcastle were paying a good chunk of his salary
I have Bumbleflex

User avatar
Logorrhea
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4263
Joined: October 2nd, 2007, 1:20 pm
Location: D24

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by Logorrhea »

tingman wrote:Its being appealed but this is potentially a hornets nest - if a recent signing came in with them already deemed over the cap is this contract null & void?.....i'm happy to pass over to our learned legal friends!
Didn't hey find themselves over the cap due to the additional arrangements they had with players? I thought their base contracts were within the cap but the fake companies set up for each player have been identified as additional earnings. I imagine those arrangements will need to be dissolved but not sure if that would allow the players to declare their whole contract void. Doubt it will.

User avatar
blockhead
Shane Jennings
Posts: 6080
Joined: December 14th, 2011, 2:20 pm
Location: Bastardstown, Co. Wexford

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by blockhead »

The other PRL clubs are looking to have their recent titles removed from the record book.
Nothing to do with Europe though.
You know I'm going to lose,
And gambling's for fools,
But that's the way I like it baby, I don't want to live FOREVER!

User avatar
cormac
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5765
Joined: May 24th, 2006, 2:05 pm

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by cormac »

Dave Cahill wrote:They'd simply have to keep to the terms of the players contracts but couldn't register them for any competitions. They would then most likely attempt to shift them out on loan if they could get someone to take on some of the cost. For example, when Finegan was (on loan) here Newcastle were paying a good chunk of his salary
Newcastle still got the better end of that deal.
Look out Itchy, he's Irish

User avatar
curates_egg
Isa Nacewa
Posts: 2522
Joined: November 29th, 2011, 4:50 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by curates_egg »

Jaysus, you lot are some craic!
I was only jokingly suggesting it.

However, for all the Sarries lawyers: if their Premiership title in 2018 were to be annulled (i.e. if they were found to be breaking the salary cap that season and that sanction were applied), surely they then illegitimately qualified for Europe. So how could their participation in that competition be deemed to be valid?
As for Glasgow being more affected, that's a reasonable violin to play. But, when winners are disqualified in sports, the award always goes to the next highest performer in the competition - even if they hampered other competitors. There is no other way to decide it.

I'm just back from the tailors, where they embroidered my fifth star onto this year's shirt. You can probably get some of those Chinese ones off d'internet with the 5 stars already though.

User avatar
LeRouxIsPHat
Cian Healy
Posts: 13197
Joined: January 22nd, 2009, 8:49 pm

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by LeRouxIsPHat »

I wonder if there's anything to prevent the business deals being dissolved but then Nigel Wray gives out million pound wedding presents etc in ten years time.

User avatar
cormac
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5765
Joined: May 24th, 2006, 2:05 pm

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by cormac »

curates_egg wrote:Jaysus, you lot are some craic!
I was only jokingly suggesting it.

However, for all the Sarries lawyers: if their Premiership title in 2018 were to be annulled (i.e. if they were found to be breaking the salary cap that season and that sanction were applied), surely they then illegitimately qualified for Europe. So how could their participation in that competition be deemed to be valid?
As for Glasgow being more affected, that's a reasonable violin to play. But, when winners are disqualified in sports, the award always goes to the next highest performer in the competition - even if they hampered other competitors. There is no other way to decide it.

I'm just back from the tailors, where they embroidered my fifth star onto this year's shirt. You can probably get some of those Chinese ones off d'internet with the 5 stars already though.
Well that's not true. There's now no recorded winner of the Tour de France in the years in which Lance Armstrong "won" those races.
Look out Itchy, he's Irish

arsebiscuits1
Enlightened
Posts: 889
Joined: November 19th, 2014, 4:53 pm

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by arsebiscuits1 »

LeRouxIsPHat wrote:I wonder if there's anything to prevent the business deals being dissolved but then Nigel Wray gives out million pound wedding presents etc in ten years time.
I hear the rate for Sarries fuel expenses has just gone up to €50 per KM and they are only permitted to travel to training via John O'Groats :lol:
He's gotten awfully fond of that brick

User avatar
blockhead
Shane Jennings
Posts: 6080
Joined: December 14th, 2011, 2:20 pm
Location: Bastardstown, Co. Wexford

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by blockhead »

Chiefs CEO wants Saracens 'severely punished' for breaching rules
“I think they should be suspended," Rowe said. “They should be suspended until they can prove their squad is within the salary cap.
“I hope that Premier Rugby make them reduce their squad immediately. If I was there, I’d be saying that can’t compete until you reduce your squad and you are within the salary cap.
“They have already broken the salary cap this year because they have played three games in this year’s Premiership with the same squad, if not better than they had last year.
“The investigation was up until last season and they won’t have changed anything. They are in breach already – it is all wrong."
You know I'm going to lose,
And gambling's for fools,
But that's the way I like it baby, I don't want to live FOREVER!

Ruckedtobits
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4896
Joined: April 10th, 2011, 10:23 am

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by Ruckedtobits »

blockhead wrote:The other PRL clubs are looking to have their recent titles removed from the record book.
Nothing to do with Europe though.
From my limited knowledge of this investigation, it is the resolve of the other Premiership Clubs, all of whom are shareholders in the competition company, which outlined the terms of the investigation, the range of sanctions available and the very limited terms of Appeal available after the investigation.

The critical element is what can Sarries do now? Total remuneration will have to reduce, but will some players consider suing the Club for under-payment of contractual earnings? There is then the question as to whether all players will stay with them on lower earnings?

As a matter of interest, it appears that the Top 14 also have a Salary Cap and, from this Season onwards a minimum number of JIFF players in each match-day Squad (essentially players of French origin). What the French Clubs don't have is the commonality of interest in the LNR (the Top14 Company) to ensure than sanctions and other fines are big enough to correct offenders. Clubs have been relegated in France for financial irregularities but no fine or points sanction of this magnitude has ever been applied.

User avatar
fourthirtythree
Rob Kearney
Posts: 9376
Joined: April 12th, 2008, 11:33 pm
Location: Eight miles high

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by fourthirtythree »

LeRouxIsPHat wrote:I wonder if there's anything to prevent the business deals being dissolved but then Nigel Wray gives out million pound wedding presents etc in ten years time.
Yes: the law.

Judges look incredibly unfavourably at spurious deals engaged in solely for the purpose of circumventing rules. Tax law is rife with case law on the subject and it really pisses people off in a bad way.

Basically it's what they have already been done for, repeating it doesn't usually go down well.
Datta: what have we given?
My friend, blood shaking my heart
The awful daring of a moment's surrender
Which an age of prudence can never retract
What the thunder said to Brian Lenihan

User avatar
curates_egg
Isa Nacewa
Posts: 2522
Joined: November 29th, 2011, 4:50 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium

Re: The Final, Saracens in Newcastle, May 11th. Drive for Fi

Post by curates_egg »

cormac wrote:
curates_egg wrote:Jaysus, you lot are some craic!
I was only jokingly suggesting it.

However, for all the Sarries lawyers: if their Premiership title in 2018 were to be annulled (i.e. if they were found to be breaking the salary cap that season and that sanction were applied), surely they then illegitimately qualified for Europe. So how could their participation in that competition be deemed to be valid?
As for Glasgow being more affected, that's a reasonable violin to play. But, when winners are disqualified in sports, the award always goes to the next highest performer in the competition - even if they hampered other competitors. There is no other way to decide it.

I'm just back from the tailors, where they embroidered my fifth star onto this year's shirt. You can probably get some of those Chinese ones off d'internet with the 5 stars already though.
Well that's not true. There's now no recorded winner of the Tour de France in the years in which Lance Armstrong "won" those races.
True, cycling doesn't apply that approach. Athletics and swimming do. F1 I guess too.

Post Reply