The players can want what they like but they won't necessarily get it. Saracens are being relegated to the Championship and will now receive only half of the central funding they thought they would get. They also have to be compliant with the salary cap for next year in order to be promoted. The current squad clearly doesn't comply with the existing salary cap so they will have to trim somewhere. Add another factor: the players don't want to be playing in the championship in a season that will now see two 6 Nations championships and a Lions tour. From a club POV, they won't get the TV revenue they are currently receiving, they get little match day revenue as it is (no fans and they don't own the stadium) and they will have much lower gates for away trips now too. They have lost their primary (i.e. shirt, stadium) sponsor and will struggle to get anything close to what they are currently receiving in that regard. I believe Barnet Council are also reducing their stipend for stadium use (or something like that).curates_egg wrote:On what are you basing this prediction? As I mentioned above, it seems - based on what I have seen - that a lot of their internationals are committing to staying (George, Daly, Goode and Koch have confirmed but there are rumours about lots of others staying).joooooe wrote: Saracens will have half their current squad by then.
My guess is that this is because they are so balls-deep in the property investment side of their "remuneration package" that it is not attractive to break contract.
I am not a subscriber to the cliche that 'we want to beat them with their best players'.
Leinster and Ireland really struggle to deal with Billy Vunipola (and Tuilagi) and I would guess Skelton is similar. I've no problem saying that I would rather play Sarries without Billy.
I've seen no updates on his injury in a month, but I would guess he is touch-and-go for the scheduled game.
In that sense, I would rather us face them now (even behind closed doors), than September.
From what I have read, the Vunipolas and Farrell are staying. This is from last week: https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/rugby/ ... 79491.html .
In short, they will hemorrhage money next season no matter what they do, but they will take any action they can to reduce this.
Given the above, can you see Itoje, Farrell, Vunipola (take your pick) and George playing away to Ealling or Coventry or Cornish Pirates instead of HC and Prem? No chance. The French clubs and the wealthier English clubs will be playing a game of pick-up-the-discarded-Saracen this summer, if not sooner. They may already have deals in place but will not want this to come out before the only match of note they have remaining this season: i.e. against us.
We may end up playing against Billy Vunipola in September, but if we do he'll be the only kid who wasn't picked at break time and he'll be part of a team similar to the one they put out against Racing a few months ago. Playing them in April is going to a be a lot harder than playing them in September.
One final thought: if it is rescheduled for September, I wonder if Saracens might agree loan deals for the players that would only kick in once their HC involvement is over? PRetty unappealing prospect for clubs taking on these players as they'd miss pre-season but it could be useful.