Ireland v Italy

Forum for the discussion of all International Rugby

Moderator: moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Donny B.
Devin Toner
Posts: 26657
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:10 pm
Location: D12!!!!!!!!!

Ireland v Italy

Post by Donny B. »

R Kearney
McFadden
Henshaw
Marshall
D Kearney
Sexton
Murray

McGrath
Best
Moore
Toner
O'Connell
O'Mahony
O'Donnell
Heaslip
User avatar
TerenureJim
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5316
Joined: May 5th, 2009, 10:09 am

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by TerenureJim »

No BOD for his last ever game in green at home?
User avatar
Donny B.
Devin Toner
Posts: 26657
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:10 pm
Location: D12!!!!!!!!!

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by Donny B. »

TerenureJim wrote:No BOD for his last ever game in green at home?
Yep. Need to give Henshaw a taste
User avatar
johng
Gordon D'Arcy
Posts: 18887
Joined: March 23rd, 2009, 10:37 pm
Location: Behind You!!

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by johng »

Donny B. wrote:
TerenureJim wrote:No BOD for his last ever game in green at home?
Yep. Need to give Henshaw a taste
And he will get a taste off the bench I'm sure. Bod not starting the test that will take him past the world cap record of George Gregan is unthinkable. He'll be gone soon enough and forever.
All Blacks nil
Mullet
Posts: 1920
Joined: December 15th, 2013, 10:52 pm

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by All Blacks nil »

60% possession
Relative domination in scrum 9/9 on own scrum (whereas England lost 4 of 9) and 16/16 on ourown lineouts won

3 clean breaks and 4 offloads in the whole game.

The foundations was set up front. Unfortunately a pedestrian and limited backline couldn't back it up. Time for reconstruction and some hard decisions methinks
User avatar
Dave Cahill
Devin Toner
Posts: 25515
Joined: January 24th, 2006, 3:32 pm
Location: None of your damn business
Contact:

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by Dave Cahill »

I think you're wrong on this one, if we are to win the championship we need to rack up the points, so we need to start our strongest possible team and have real pace men on the bench once the Italians have been pummelled for an hour to apply the coup de grace. We have to assume that England will put a big total on Italy and that Wales will do the same to Scotland on the last day(even if they don't we have to plan for it). We don't want to run out against France knowing even a win might not be enough
I have Bumbleflex
Raydollard
Graduate
Posts: 730
Joined: September 19th, 2010, 12:03 pm

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by Raydollard »

add Madigan and Reddan for Sexton and Murray
Ruckedtobits
Rob Kearney
Posts: 8117
Joined: April 10th, 2011, 10:23 am

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by Ruckedtobits »

Totally agree with analysis of DC
I think you're wrong on this one, if we are to win the championship we need to rack up the points, so we need to start our strongest possible team and have real pace men on the bench once the Italians have been pummelled for an hour to apply the coup de grace. We have to assume that England will put a big total on Italy and that Wales will do the same to Scotland on the last day(even if they don't we have to plan for it). We don't want to run out against France knowing even a win might not be enough.
If we can get Squad to re-focus on winning the Championship, it must be by posting enough points in our last home game against Italy. England and Wales will eliminate one of our direct competition and ideally we'll get to Paris with an very good points differential with just a victory giving us the Championship.

In those circumstances, I might have Marshall or Henshaw on the bench as it does not look like Tommy Bowe will make it back in time. However, if Luke Fitz stays injury free I would certainly include him on the panel for the last two games. As Zebo hasn't been in Camp much since beginning of October, I think his prospects of starting are very limited. Henderson is certainly worth keeping on the bench but bring him on no later than 60 mins. Italy are strong in 2nd row and back-row and will be totally focussed on avoiding wooden spoon. However, they are not as well-drilled defensively as England and this will give us opportunities.

Finally, we must really get our heads around the fact that the 6N is determined by points difference, not tries. Take every opportunity to keep the scoreboard moving, particularly drop goals
User avatar
CiaranIrl
Seán Cronin
Posts: 3880
Joined: April 27th, 2009, 11:23 am
Location: Dun Laoghaire

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by CiaranIrl »

Kearney
McFadden
O'Driscoll
Marshall
Zebo
Sexton
Murray

Healy
Cronin
Ross
Toner
O'Connell
O'Mahony
O'Donnell
Heaslip

Would be my choice. Faster, more attacking backline. I'd actually drop Best and Henry, frankly. Unacceptable number of missed tackles from Best, and Henry was slow out on the wings and went to ground too easily with ball in hand. Great at the breakdown, but poor as a linkman I thought.
“As you all know first prize is a Cadillac El Dorado. Anyone wanna see second prize? Second prize is a set of steak knives. Third prize is you're fired.”
User avatar
munster#1
Shane Jennings
Posts: 6054
Joined: June 18th, 2009, 3:47 pm

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by munster#1 »

As stated above, we will see a close to first choice team, we need as many points from this as possible.

I would change the two centers, bod missed as many tackles as he made, and I don't think darce has earned his jersey. That said, if henshaw is starting I would see the merit in retaining D'Arcy.

I personally would bring zebo in for trimble, and retain mcfadden as backup.

This may be a game to rest pom and start Henderson, and bring Ryan to the bench along with pom or copeland.
Just because a post upsets you, that doesn’t mean that it is wrong. People have different views in all aspects of life, this is a key ingredient to an interesting conversation.
User avatar
paddyor
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5807
Joined: November 16th, 2012, 11:48 pm

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by paddyor »

CiaranIrl wrote:Kearney
McFadden
O'Driscoll
Marshall
Zebo
Sexton
Murray

Healy
Cronin
Ross
Toner
O'Connell
O'Mahony
O'Donnell
Heaslip

Would be my choice. Faster, more attacking backline. I'd actually drop Best and Henry, frankly. Unacceptable number of missed tackles from Best, and Henry was slow out on the wings and went to ground too easily with ball in hand. Great at the breakdown, but poor as a linkman I thought.
Henry posted better stats against England than TOD did against Ospreys B. He made 15 tackles and missed none better than both Heaslip and POM combined. And he beat as many defenders as them 2 combined. Can see where your coming from with Best, but Cronin still can't hook which will be a problem against a strong Italian scrum. I would like to see some change in the back row though with someone moving to the bench and the replacement getting a start. Schmidt seems to favour Murphy but I'd give Ruddock a go. Of course with Henderson covering 6 this seems unlikely.

The problem was Sexton being off his game(excepting defense); missing BODs pass; throwing a long forward pass; bad kicking in general. Had Schmidt more faith in his kicking from the tee I think Jackson would have gotten on much earlier on Saturday.

I'd expect a similar gameplan to Scotland and Wales and hopefully a similar score. I'd be delighted if it gets us to within a win of a championship
Ruddock's tackle stats consistently too low for me to be taken seriously as a Six Nations blindside..... Ruddock's defensive stats don't stack up. - All Blacks Nil, Jan 15th, 2014
England A 8 - 14 Ireland A, 25th Jan 2014
Ruddock(c) 19/2 Tackles
User avatar
paddyor
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5807
Joined: November 16th, 2012, 11:48 pm

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by paddyor »

munster#1 wrote: This may be a game to rest pom and start Henderson, and bring Ryan to the bench along with pom or copeland.
Copeland really???? Why? He was released earlier from the squad than either Ruddock or TOD. Ryan was quiet today and hasn't done enough to displace either Toner or Henderson.
Ruddock's tackle stats consistently too low for me to be taken seriously as a Six Nations blindside..... Ruddock's defensive stats don't stack up. - All Blacks Nil, Jan 15th, 2014
England A 8 - 14 Ireland A, 25th Jan 2014
Ruddock(c) 19/2 Tackles
neilinboston
Knowledgeable
Posts: 479
Joined: October 9th, 2010, 3:14 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by neilinboston »

All Blacks nil wrote:60% possession
Relative domination in scrum 9/9 on own scrum (whereas England lost 4 of 9) and 16/16 on ourown lineouts won

3 clean breaks and 4 offloads in the whole game.

The foundations was set up front. Unfortunately a pedestrian and limited backline couldn't back it up. Time for reconstruction and some hard decisions methinks
seriously you think your points are so good that we want you to copy and paste the exact same thing in multiple threads.
he who shouts loudest is rarely correct. if you concentrated on just making a point instead of trolling you'd be a valued contributor.
User avatar
paddyor
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5807
Joined: November 16th, 2012, 11:48 pm

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by paddyor »

All Blacks nil wrote:60% possession
Relative domination in scrum 9/9 on own scrum (whereas England lost 4 of 9) and 16/16 on ourown lineouts won

3 clean breaks and 4 offloads in the whole game.

The foundations was set up front. Unfortunately a pedestrian and limited backline couldn't back it up. Time for reconstruction and some hard decisions methinks
Said backline have 4 tries to their name out of a total of 6(France are the same with 6) and have conceded just 1(Wales and England have conceded 4 each) giving us a points difference of 42(21 better than England). It wasn't the backs that lost us the game yesterday. It was poor display from Sexton, in particularly kicking, and bad defense from the tight 5(the English back 3 seeking them out when they where returning the ball). They only had 8 lineouts and IIRC took 2 defensive ones quickly. We never really got a chance to compete on their throw.

And just for completeness there isn't a back 3 player or outside back in Ireland who alone or as part of the team had the winning of Saturdays game in them. We lost by a score in Twickenham disappointing but a very creditable result of late.
Ruddock's tackle stats consistently too low for me to be taken seriously as a Six Nations blindside..... Ruddock's defensive stats don't stack up. - All Blacks Nil, Jan 15th, 2014
England A 8 - 14 Ireland A, 25th Jan 2014
Ruddock(c) 19/2 Tackles
pip14
Learner
Posts: 94
Joined: January 18th, 2009, 12:20 pm

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by pip14 »

Dropping Best and Henry? Are you mad? Two of the more consistent Ireland players this six nations IMHO
User avatar
suisse
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5088
Joined: April 2nd, 2007, 12:23 am
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Contact:

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by suisse »

paddyor wrote:
munster#1 wrote: This may be a game to rest pom and start Henderson, and bring Ryan to the bench along with pom or copeland.
Copeland really???? Why? He was released earlier from the squad than either Ruddock or TOD. Ryan was quiet today and hasn't done enough to displace either Toner or Henderson.
You see this on Munsterfans a lot. I'd say there was hardly a person in the country who wanted Copeland involved with Irish 23 man squads until he signed a contract to play for Munster next season, It was the same with Downey.
User avatar
suisse
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5088
Joined: April 2nd, 2007, 12:23 am
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Contact:

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by suisse »

CiaranIrl wrote: Would be my choice. Faster, more attacking backline. I'd actually drop Best and Henry, frankly. Unacceptable number of missed tackles from Best, and Henry was slow out on the wings and went to ground too easily with ball in hand. Great at the breakdown, but poor as a linkman I thought.
I don't agree with this at all.
User avatar
Dave Cahill
Devin Toner
Posts: 25515
Joined: January 24th, 2006, 3:32 pm
Location: None of your damn business
Contact:

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by Dave Cahill »

suisse wrote:
paddyor wrote:
munster#1 wrote: This may be a game to rest pom and start Henderson, and bring Ryan to the bench along with pom or copeland.
Copeland really???? Why? He was released earlier from the squad than either Ruddock or TOD. Ryan was quiet today and hasn't done enough to displace either Toner or Henderson.
You see this on Munsterfans a lot. I'd say there was hardly a person in the country who wanted Copeland involved with Irish 23 man squads until he signed a contract to play for Munster next season, It was the same with Downey.
Copeland was comprehensively outplayed by a young fella making his debut last thursday - perhaps we really should start that Conan for Ireland campaign!
I have Bumbleflex
neilinboston
Knowledgeable
Posts: 479
Joined: October 9th, 2010, 3:14 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by neilinboston »

Dave Cahill wrote:
suisse wrote:
paddyor wrote: Copeland really???? Why? He was released earlier from the squad than either Ruddock or TOD. Ryan was quiet today and hasn't done enough to displace either Toner or Henderson.
You see this on Munsterfans a lot. I'd say there was hardly a person in the country who wanted Copeland involved with Irish 23 man squads until he signed a contract to play for Munster next season, It was the same with Downey.
Copeland was comprehensively outplayed by a young fella making his debut last thursday - perhaps we really should start that Conan for Ireland campaign!
i haven't seen or read that match thread yet but i fully endorse and/or support this product/theory.
while we're at it, there's a guy playing for willow park with a lot of promise...he should be in Ireland camp! #ridiculousMunstersupporters!
User avatar
suisse
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5088
Joined: April 2nd, 2007, 12:23 am
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Contact:

Re: Ireland v Italy

Post by suisse »

Dave Cahill wrote:Copeland was comprehensively outplayed by a young fella making his debut last thursday - perhaps we really should start that Conan for Ireland campaign!
I did like the comment on mf.com after the England game;

"Time to call up the Leinster Academy"
Post Reply