Wolfhounds v Saxons
Moderator: moderators
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
Henshaw and Fitz have never played together as a pairing and v important from Schmidts point of view - haven't trained together either
You could probably argue that Fitz is getting gametime at wing fro two reasons - integrate back into a Schmidt style and because he will likely be covering wing next week and hasn't played there in an age. Theres also a strong possibility that Schmidt just prefers Fitz as winger and Earls as a centre
He could well get a chance at 13 during the 6Nations - but if we get a fit and firing 12 (I'd love Madigan there) then its Henshaw by a mile ahead of Payne, Fitz, Earls etc
The Madigan selection has me a bit baffled tbh - he doesn't need gametime - hasn't played at 10 much lately but as played loads and with Sexton and Jackson un available it seems like an unnecessary risk - maybe Keatley is in the running to start?
Same arhgument goes for McGrath and Cronin - with Healy out why risk McGrath - he's been out a couple of weeks, no big deal - injury and we have Cronin starting and Bent on the bench which is a huge ask for both of them
You could probably argue that Fitz is getting gametime at wing fro two reasons - integrate back into a Schmidt style and because he will likely be covering wing next week and hasn't played there in an age. Theres also a strong possibility that Schmidt just prefers Fitz as winger and Earls as a centre
He could well get a chance at 13 during the 6Nations - but if we get a fit and firing 12 (I'd love Madigan there) then its Henshaw by a mile ahead of Payne, Fitz, Earls etc
The Madigan selection has me a bit baffled tbh - he doesn't need gametime - hasn't played at 10 much lately but as played loads and with Sexton and Jackson un available it seems like an unnecessary risk - maybe Keatley is in the running to start?
Same arhgument goes for McGrath and Cronin - with Healy out why risk McGrath - he's been out a couple of weeks, no big deal - injury and we have Cronin starting and Bent on the bench which is a huge ask for both of them
- baaba maal
- Knowledgeable
- Posts: 319
- Joined: February 21st, 2009, 10:05 am
- Location: beyond the pale
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
And + another 1.
Gotta hand it to Joe- he likes to shake things up. I sure as hell didn't see Luke going to the wing- possible Dave Kearney absence being covered? But Joe being Joe, Earls could start on the wing for Italy.
Gotta hand it to Joe- he likes to shake things up. I sure as hell didn't see Luke going to the wing- possible Dave Kearney absence being covered? But Joe being Joe, Earls could start on the wing for Italy.
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
That would be a completely unJoe like thing to do. Almost impossible to see anything other than Zebo and Bowe - two best available options and men in possession (who impressed last time out) - bit of a no brainer imobaaba maal wrote:And + another 1.
Gotta hand it to Joe- he likes to shake things up. I sure as hell didn't see Luke going to the wing- possible Dave Kearney absence being covered? But Joe being Joe, Earls could start on the wing for Italy.
I'm delighted at the return of the Fitz/Earls debate - great that they are in contention but the same old lazy clichés being turned out
Earls - Rabid Munster fan has him starting at 13 and vastly overstating his form/capabilities, Rabid Leinster fan think he's not even Pro 12 level centre
Fitz - Rabid Leinster fans has him starting at 13 and vastly overstating his form/capabilities, Rabid Munster fans don't actually mind him but think he can't score, create or make breaks
The reality as always is somewhere in the middle. Earls has done far better at 13 than Fitz ever has, but has definite limitations at 13. Fitz is possibly one of the best footballers we've had for years, but has never been really really top end. Both have been shifted way too much in their careers and been injured way too much
IMO they are both really good options at 13 - not sure either will ever be first choice - Henshaw is better than them both at the moment
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
Total nonsense, Fitz has been MOTM nearly every week at 13 this seasonGolf Man wrote:baaba maal wrote:And + another 1.
Gotta hand it to Joe- he likes to shake things up. I sure as hell didn't see Luke going to the wing- possible Dave Kearney absence being covered? But Joe being Joe, Earls could start on the wing for Italy.
The reality as always is somewhere in the middle. Earls has done far better at 13 than Fitz ever has, but has definite limitations at 13.
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
Joe, as an international coach, has typically had his likely team training together for the two weeks (If possible) prior to a game.
That being the case Murray and Keatley could be the starting HBs against Italy for example.
However for the 6Ns match schedule he obviously has to make some adjustments to the way/when the likely teams will train together.
We might get an insight into how he manages the schedule over the next few weeks.
He might for example have two match day squads. One for the slightly easier Italy and Scotland games. The other for the big three.
It's hard to see where the Wolfhounds match fits in if even.
That being the case Murray and Keatley could be the starting HBs against Italy for example.
However for the 6Ns match schedule he obviously has to make some adjustments to the way/when the likely teams will train together.
We might get an insight into how he manages the schedule over the next few weeks.
He might for example have two match day squads. One for the slightly easier Italy and Scotland games. The other for the big three.
It's hard to see where the Wolfhounds match fits in if even.
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall who's the greatest player of them all? It is Drico your majesty.
- fourthirtythree
- Leo Cullen
- Posts: 10704
- Joined: April 12th, 2008, 11:33 pm
- Location: Eight miles high
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
I don't think GM has actually watched Leinster regularly recently as he also said that Fitzgerald was inexperienced at 13 and it would be parachuting him in to play him there instead of the actually inexperienced and not in great form at 13 Payne.
I think both Zebo and Earls are better wingers and full backs than Luke. He's a good player but he isn't a natural international standard wing. Lacks either the pace or sheer size that you need there. They're probably better at kicking, fielding, and have better pace. He works better in confined spaces where his balance and sense of timing bring others into the game. He's also probably a better defender than either of those.
Luke hasn't played 12 in years though has he?
I think both Zebo and Earls are better wingers and full backs than Luke. He's a good player but he isn't a natural international standard wing. Lacks either the pace or sheer size that you need there. They're probably better at kicking, fielding, and have better pace. He works better in confined spaces where his balance and sense of timing bring others into the game. He's also probably a better defender than either of those.
Luke hasn't played 12 in years though has he?
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
The only thing GM watches is his hole cos he lost the flexibility to vanish up it a few seasons ago.fourthirtythree wrote:I don't think GM has actually watched Leinster regularly recently as he also said that Fitzgerald was inexperienced at 13 and it would be parachuting him in to play him there instead of the actually inexperienced and not in great form at 13 Payne.
I think both Zebo and Earls are better wingers and full backs than Luke. He's a good player but he isn't a natural international standard wing. Lacks either the pace or sheer size that you need there. They're probably better at kicking, fielding, and have better pace. He works better in confined spaces where his balance and sense of timing bring others into the game. He's also probably a better defender than either of those.
Luke hasn't played 12 in years though has he?
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall who's the greatest player of them all? It is Drico your majesty.
- simonokeeffe
- Jamie Heaslip
- Posts: 16777
- Joined: July 21st, 2011, 3:04 am
- Location: Dublin
- Contact:
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
Joe is doing more Professor X voodoo mind sh*t
Retired from babbling. Can be found on twittter @okeeffesimon
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
I personally feel there is a major selection error in the centre. There is only one person in Ireland that really believes Earls is a13 and he is playing in that position for the wolfhounds. He will not pass and link with other plyers a prerequisite for the positin If he has to play then I would swop him around with Fitzgerald.
Why is this young guy Darcy being giving a run at 12, what can Joe learn about him in the pre RWC season. Luke Marshall played a full 80 minutes last week agains Leicester and it would have been an excellent oppurtunity too to slot Payne in at his best position 15.
Also disappointing to see Henderson in the second Row just think what a combination it would be with him and Obrian @ 6 & 7 enough to strike fear into any opposition team.
Then of course I would be looking for two new 2nd rows perhaps Foley and Alan O'connor as Idont see a big future in McCarthy who is only keeping Touheys seat warm for him.
I can understand that some of the more established players returning from injury need game time but there are some there who I hopefully cannot see being in contention come September and surely this an ideal time to see if there are any potential late bloomers among the fringe players and clarify further the potential RWC Squad,
Why is this young guy Darcy being giving a run at 12, what can Joe learn about him in the pre RWC season. Luke Marshall played a full 80 minutes last week agains Leicester and it would have been an excellent oppurtunity too to slot Payne in at his best position 15.
Also disappointing to see Henderson in the second Row just think what a combination it would be with him and Obrian @ 6 & 7 enough to strike fear into any opposition team.
Then of course I would be looking for two new 2nd rows perhaps Foley and Alan O'connor as Idont see a big future in McCarthy who is only keeping Touheys seat warm for him.
I can understand that some of the more established players returning from injury need game time but there are some there who I hopefully cannot see being in contention come September and surely this an ideal time to see if there are any potential late bloomers among the fringe players and clarify further the potential RWC Squad,
- Tonic Wine
- Bookworm
- Posts: 107
- Joined: September 9th, 2014, 1:21 pm
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
Fitzgeralds return of scoring in only 1 of his 27 games for Ireland is a shocking statistic.He definately is a brave defender to his detriment but the hype surrounding him is bordering on the insane.Earls return of 12 tries in 39 games reeks of international pedigree.
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
Dave Foley is injured, Aird. He's having surgery on a dodgy wrist and is out for 3 months or so [source: http://www.espn.co.uk/ireland/rugby/story/254323.html ]. With regard to Mike McCarthy, I think he's playing the best rugby he has played since arriving at Leinster. He doesn't really need to have a 'big future', he just needs to keep playing at this level for the next nine months, which will take in a whole rake of Six Nations, warm-up and RWC tests.Aird wrote:I personally feel there is a major selection error in the centre. There is only one person in Ireland that really believes Earls is a13 and he is playing in that position for the wolfhounds. He will not pass and link with other plyers a prerequisite for the positin If he has to play then I would swop him around with Fitzgerald.
Why is this young guy Darcy being giving a run at 12, what can Joe learn about him in the pre RWC season. Luke Marshall played a full 80 minutes last week agains Leicester and it would have been an excellent oppurtunity too to slot Payne in at his best position 15.
Also disappointing to see Henderson in the second Row just think what a combination it would be with him and Obrian @ 6 & 7 enough to strike fear into any opposition team.
Then of course I would be looking for two new 2nd rows perhaps Foley and Alan O'connor as Idont see a big future in McCarthy who is only keeping Touheys seat warm for him.
I can understand that some of the more established players returning from injury need game time but there are some there who I hopefully cannot see being in contention come September and surely this an ideal time to see if there are any potential late bloomers among the fringe players and clarify further the potential RWC Squad,
Personally speaking, I think it's very likely that Earls and Fitz will swap positions at some time during the game. Certainly I would be surprised if they didn't. Plenty of reasons to select D'Arcy – to see if he can still thrive in international rugby and to provide some stability to the players directly inside [Madigan] and outside [Earls], who haven't played much rugby in those positions in recent months.
There's a time when it's wiser to stop using the crutch of building for some nebulous 'future' that never arrives and just select the team based on what you've been seeing for the last three months or so. I think the only thing Schmidt is all that guilty of with this selection [which I think is very strong] is being pragmatic, which I don't think is any crime at all.
- Peg Leg
- Rob Kearney
- Posts: 9823
- Joined: February 1st, 2010, 5:08 pm
- Location: Procrastinasia
- Contact:
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
That's gas, I dislike seeing Hendo picked as a flanker! If there is an area Ireland are resource light, its the second row. if there is an area Ireland are flush, its the backrow. Henderson is a great candidate to make it to the big leagues in the row, I say keep giving him time there.Aird wrote:I personally feel there is a major selection error in the centre. There is only one person in Ireland that really believes Earls is a13 and he is playing in that position for the wolfhounds. He will not pass and link with other plyers a prerequisite for the positin If he has to play then I would swop him around with Fitzgerald.
Why is this young guy Darcy being giving a run at 12, what can Joe learn about him in the pre RWC season. Luke Marshall played a full 80 minutes last week agains Leicester and it would have been an excellent oppurtunity too to slot Payne in at his best position 15.
Also disappointing to see Henderson in the second Row just think what a combination it would be with him and Obrian @ 6 & 7 enough to strike fear into any opposition team.
Then of course I would be looking for two new 2nd rows perhaps Foley and Alan O'connor as Idont see a big future in McCarthy who is only keeping Touheys seat warm for him.
I can understand that some of the more established players returning from injury need game time but there are some there who I hopefully cannot see being in contention come September and surely this an ideal time to see if there are any potential late bloomers among the fringe players and clarify further the potential RWC Squad,
"It was Mrs O'Leary's cow"
Daniel Sullivan
Daniel Sullivan
- Dave Cahill
- Devin Toner
- Posts: 25509
- Joined: January 24th, 2006, 3:32 pm
- Location: None of your damn business
- Contact:
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
The future is now!hugonaut wrote:
There's a time when it's wiser to stop using the crutch of building for some nebulous 'future' that never arrives and just select the team based on what you've been seeing for the last three months or so.
There will be people complaining about the lack of future planning in the team selected for the game against France in the MilStad.
I have Bumbleflex
- LeRouxIsPHat
- Jamie Heaslip
- Posts: 15008
- Joined: January 22nd, 2009, 7:49 pm
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
Which is fair enough. Kidney selected the half backs for the quarter final against Wales with no thought for the future 80 minutes.Dave Cahill wrote:The future is now!hugonaut wrote:
There's a time when it's wiser to stop using the crutch of building for some nebulous 'future' that never arrives and just select the team based on what you've been seeing for the last three months or so.
There will be people complaining about the lack of future planning in the team selected for the game against France in the MilStad.
- simonokeeffe
- Jamie Heaslip
- Posts: 16777
- Joined: July 21st, 2011, 3:04 am
- Location: Dublin
- Contact:
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
did you just compare Joe to deccieLeRouxIsPHat wrote:Which is fair enough. Kidney selected the half backs for the quarter final against Wales with no thought for the future 80 minutes.Dave Cahill wrote:The future is now!hugonaut wrote:
There's a time when it's wiser to stop using the crutch of building for some nebulous 'future' that never arrives and just select the team based on what you've been seeing for the last three months or so.
There will be people complaining about the lack of future planning in the team selected for the game against France in the MilStad.
Retired from babbling. Can be found on twittter @okeeffesimon
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
Ignore him, he's just trying to make Joe look good.simonokeeffe wrote:did you just compare Joe to deccieLeRouxIsPHat wrote:Which is fair enough. Kidney selected the half backs for the quarter final against Wales with no thought for the future 80 minutes.Dave Cahill wrote: The future is now!
There will be people complaining about the lack of future planning in the team selected for the game against France in the MilStad.
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall who's the greatest player of them all? It is Drico your majesty.
- Dave Cahill
- Devin Toner
- Posts: 25509
- Joined: January 24th, 2006, 3:32 pm
- Location: None of your damn business
- Contact:
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
80 mins is too long a time frame. after the first 40mins have elapsed you have to reset for the next 40mins. Dekko never really got that last bit. EOS was a bit of a slouch about it too.LeRouxIsPHat wrote:Which is fair enough. Kidney selected the half backs for the quarter final against Wales with no thought for the future 80 minutes.Dave Cahill wrote:The future is now!hugonaut wrote:
There's a time when it's wiser to stop using the crutch of building for some nebulous 'future' that never arrives and just select the team based on what you've been seeing for the last three months or so.
There will be people complaining about the lack of future planning in the team selected for the game against France in the MilStad.
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall who's the greatest player of them all? It is Drico your majesty.
- Grumpy Old Man
- Shane Jennings
- Posts: 6636
- Joined: February 22nd, 2006, 3:22 pm
- Location: Home for the Slightly Bewildered
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
FFS - if it wasn't for bad luck...Dave Cahill wrote:Luke out ill. Gilroy starts, Conway to bench.
A proud Winsome Fluter
Re: Wolfhounds v Saxons
Is this broadcast on the radio does anyone know?