Flash Gordon wrote:
Duff, you are entitled to your opinion on schools and club rugby - would you please explain why anybody who disagrees with your opinion is a "nutjob"? Strikes me that this an incredibly arrogant viewpoint.
I am telling you what your average Kiely's going punter thinks - I have heard it so many times. If you don't accept that there has been a strong anti clubs and anti schools theme on this website in the past 6months or so, then I give up.
Flash Gordon wrote:From a personal viewpoint, I've been very surprised by the blind defence of anything that is club rugby on this site from you and others.
Flash it's not blind defence - it's generally a defence from some of the outrageous rubbish that gets thrown their way on this site. The very fact that you call it blind defence says a lot about your position and how much you have taken on aboard.
Flash Gordon wrote:The club game is going down the tubes in this country and it's precisely because people aren't prepared to accept challenge that this is happening in my view.
That is a massive over-simplification and an argument for another day. Suffice to say that it's easy to throw out a line like that, to identify all the solutions from behind your pc, but in the real world, some highly able people - people who have been much more successful in life than you or I - haven't been able to find a solution so maybe give them a bit more credit eh.
Flash Gordon wrote: You will note that some of the criticism is coming from guys who both played and were involved in clubs for years.
Yes that's fair enough but times have changed and the situation is very different now than it was.
Flash Gordon wrote:As for the cliqueness, you need to elaborate. Because all I see is more and more people getting involved - every time we have an activity more and more people are becoming involved. Most of the people I go to games with are people I didn't know at the beginning of the season.
The clique comment referred to the fact that the same half dozen people apparently dominate virtually every single thread on this forum and people who don't tow the party line are usually persona non grata, hence the mass exodus compared to when the site started.
Flash Gordon wrote:On ePaddy, well, if there are specific incidents you want to raise on him - or if he wants to, why don't we discuss them? From my part - I see the guy posting here and saying that he deliberately engages in winding up people to get a kick out of them reacting. I'd put it to you that this doesn't exactly build a case for him being given an awful lot of sympathy in this area.
Careful now Flash - glass houses and all that. I've seen you throw out some awful rancid bait. Epaddy is a very addition to any forum if you ask me - he throws out a lot of controversial stuff that generates a bit of reaction fair enough, but if there wasn't a hint of truth to any of it then people wouldn't react. He plays devil's advocate more often than not but at least he's straight up about it, it's fair enough in my book.
Flash Gordon wrote:As for the LSC - it is not fictitious. Buses don't appear fictitiously, quizz nights don't happen fictitiously, socials don't happen fictitiously, flags/drums etc don't appear fictitiously, negotiations with the branch on away trips don't happen fictitiously etc etc I could go on. From my perspective, there's a lot more happening and a lot more momentum coming from the LSC than there are in many of the clubs I'm close to.
It's true that all those things do happen but that doesn't make it a supporter's club - and that's that the "ficticious" bit applied to. Again, an argument for another day.
Flash Gordon wrote:To be honest, anybody can knock and criticise from the outside and offer no constructive suggestions whatsoever. But I personally respect people who make the effort to offer constructive suggestions for change.
Don't be afraid of criticism Flash, it's the makings of great things.