Leinster v Salarysins

A forum for true blue Leinster supporters to talk about and support their team

Moderator: moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Lar
Mullet
Posts: 1694
Joined: May 18th, 2011, 6:18 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by Lar »

Apologies curates egg, Myles is right. Thursday morning.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Four Stars
User avatar
footrush
Rhys Ruddock
Posts: 2268
Joined: February 5th, 2009, 7:50 pm
Location: Marble City

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by footrush »

Ticket system worked fine this morning !. :happy clapper:
Flying wedge
wixfjord
Leo Cullen
Posts: 11378
Joined: April 13th, 2009, 1:00 pm

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by wixfjord »

Unbelievable.

Following an investigation, EPCR has decided to bring a misconduct complaint against Saracens arising from the club’s Heineken Champions Cup, Round 6 match against Racing 92 on Sunday, 19 January.

EPCR was informed by Saracens earlier this week that their player, Titi Lamositele, who was named in the match day squad for the fixture at Allianz Park and who came on to the field of play as a replacement in the 60th minute, may have been ineligible due an inadvertent administrative error on behalf of the club.

Lamositele was eligible at the time the Saracens match day squad was announced, however, the club has indicated to EPCR that the player’s work permit expired on Saturday, 18 January, the day before the fixture against Racing 92, and this may have constituted a breach of the Disciplinary Rules of the 2019/20 EPCR Participation Agreement.

An independent Disciplinary Committee consisting of Roger Morris (Wales), Chair, Pamela Woodman (Scotland) and Jean-Noel Couraud (France) has been appointed to hear the misconduct complaint in London this evening (Friday, 7 February) at 18.00 local time.

EPCR will be making no further comment until the decision of the independent Disciplinary Committee has been communicated.
User avatar
locho
Bookworm
Posts: 218
Joined: October 2nd, 2007, 2:06 pm

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by locho »

wixfjord wrote:Unbelievable.

Following an investigation, EPCR has decided to bring a misconduct complaint against Saracens arising from the club’s Heineken Champions Cup, Round 6 match against Racing 92 on Sunday, 19 January.

EPCR was informed by Saracens earlier this week that their player, Titi Lamositele, who was named in the match day squad for the fixture at Allianz Park and who came on to the field of play as a replacement in the 60th minute, may have been ineligible due an inadvertent administrative error on behalf of the club.

Lamositele was eligible at the time the Saracens match day squad was announced, however, the club has indicated to EPCR that the player’s work permit expired on Saturday, 18 January, the day before the fixture against Racing 92, and this may have constituted a breach of the Disciplinary Rules of the 2019/20 EPCR Participation Agreement.

An independent Disciplinary Committee consisting of Roger Morris (Wales), Chair, Pamela Woodman (Scotland) and Jean-Noel Couraud (France) has been appointed to hear the misconduct complaint in London this evening (Friday, 7 February) at 18.00 local time.

EPCR will be making no further comment until the decision of the independent Disciplinary Committee has been communicated.
I wonder what the sanction will be?
User avatar
cormac
Rob Kearney
Posts: 7767
Joined: May 24th, 2006, 2:05 pm
Location: The Moon

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by cormac »

I suspect they'll just get fined.
Look out Itchy, he's Irish
jimbobjoe
Mullet
Posts: 1305
Joined: September 16th, 2009, 9:23 pm

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by jimbobjoe »

Can't see that on the EPCR website? Have a link?
User avatar
riocard911
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5975
Joined: July 27th, 2015, 10:42 pm

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by riocard911 »

jimbobjoe wrote:Can't see that on the EPCR website? Have a link?
Potentially not just our quarter-final opponents would change from Sarries to Glasgow, but the whole make up of the four matches. The result would be

Leinster v Glasgow
Racing v Northampton
Exeter v Ulster
Toulouse v Clermont.

See comments section: https://www.the42.ie/saracens-ineligibl ... 8-Feb2020/
User avatar
cormac
Rob Kearney
Posts: 7767
Joined: May 24th, 2006, 2:05 pm
Location: The Moon

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by cormac »

jimbobjoe wrote:Can't see that on the EPCR website? Have a link?
Not on their website at the moment but the tweet came from their official account.

Grenoble were docked four match points and fined €10k, plus the result was awarded 28-0 to the opposition, when they fielded an ineligible player in the Amlin Cup in 2012-13.

https://www.the42.ie/saracens-ineligibl ... 8-Feb2020/
Look out Itchy, he's Irish
User avatar
kermischocolate
Mullet
Posts: 1259
Joined: May 17th, 2009, 2:56 am
Location: Glasgow

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by kermischocolate »

wixfjord wrote:Unbelievable.

Following an investigation, EPCR has decided to bring a misconduct complaint against Saracens arising from the club’s Heineken Champions Cup, Round 6 match against Racing 92 on Sunday, 19 January.

EPCR was informed by Saracens earlier this week that their player, Titi Lamositele, who was named in the match day squad for the fixture at Allianz Park and who came on to the field of play as a replacement in the 60th minute, may have been ineligible due an inadvertent administrative error on behalf of the club.

Lamositele was eligible at the time the Saracens match day squad was announced, however, the club has indicated to EPCR that the player’s work permit expired on Saturday, 18 January, the day before the fixture against Racing 92, and this may have constituted a breach of the Disciplinary Rules of the 2019/20 EPCR Participation Agreement.

An independent Disciplinary Committee consisting of Roger Morris (Wales), Chair, Pamela Woodman (Scotland) and Jean-Noel Couraud (France) has been appointed to hear the misconduct complaint in London this evening (Friday, 7 February) at 18.00 local time.

EPCR will be making no further comment until the decision of the independent Disciplinary Committee has been communicated.
Utter shambles!

What intrigues me is who brought it to the attention of EPCR and why?
User avatar
Twist
Rhys Ruddock
Posts: 2128
Joined: September 14th, 2011, 2:33 am

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by Twist »

Here’s a statement. Doesnt add much


https://www.epcrugby.com/2020/02/07/mis ... -saracens/
jimbobjoe
Mullet
Posts: 1305
Joined: September 16th, 2009, 9:23 pm

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by jimbobjoe »

riocard911 wrote:
jimbobjoe wrote:Can't see that on the EPCR website? Have a link?
Potentially not just our quarter-final opponents would change from Sarries to Glasgow, but the whole make up of the four matches. The result would be

Leinster v Glasgow
Racing v Northampton
Exeter v Ulster
Toulouse v Clermont.

See comments section: https://www.the42.ie/saracens-ineligibl ... 8-Feb2020/
Thanks - Very interesting what the decision will be.
User avatar
Twist
Rhys Ruddock
Posts: 2128
Joined: September 14th, 2011, 2:33 am

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by Twist »

riocard911 wrote:
jimbobjoe wrote:Can't see that on the EPCR website? Have a link?
Potentially not just our quarter-final opponents would change from Sarries to Glasgow, but the whole make up of the four matches. The result would be

Leinster v Glasgow
Racing v Northampton
Exeter v Ulster
Toulouse v Clermont.

See comments section: https://www.the42.ie/saracens-ineligibl ... 8-Feb2020/
That'd be too much disruption at this stage. Fans have made travel plans, if nothing else. A straight swop with Glasgow might be on the cards though. Any sanction like suspending the player or a fine would be meaningless.
User avatar
domhnallj
Rhys Ruddock
Posts: 2915
Joined: May 19th, 2011, 9:12 am

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by domhnallj »

They'll probably claim it was an administrative error even though its impossible to believe that they wouldn't be aware of, and be, compliant with UK HO regs for overseas players (they're probably in a world of hurt from the HO over this now). I wouldn't believe a word they say. Screw fining them, f%~k them out on their ear.
"That was shiterarse coaches need to look at themselves this is as bad at is.beem with school. Items impeovrnkyb neefedc"

Golf Man sums up the mood of a nation
User avatar
Oldschool
Cian Healy
Posts: 14511
Joined: March 27th, 2008, 1:10 pm

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by Oldschool »

Eh lads before we get too precious, I seem to remember that we brought a player to SA whom we then had to fly home, sort out the visa and fly back out again.
I also seem to recall that we had a problem with another foreign player who we simply failed to register for the HEC.
One was from NZ and the other an Argie.
As for Saracens, good luck with that. :wink:
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall who's the greatest player of them all? It is Drico your majesty.
User avatar
domhnallj
Rhys Ruddock
Posts: 2915
Joined: May 19th, 2011, 9:12 am

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by domhnallj »

Oldschool wrote:Eh lads before we get too precious, I seem to remember that we brought a player to SA whom we then had to fly home, sort out the visa and fly back out again.
I also seem to recall that we had a problem with another foreign player who we simply failed to register for the HEC.
One was from NZ and the other an Argie.
As for Saracens, good luck with that. :wink:
Too late, my dander is up...way up!
"That was shiterarse coaches need to look at themselves this is as bad at is.beem with school. Items impeovrnkyb neefedc"

Golf Man sums up the mood of a nation
arsebiscuits1
Mullet
Posts: 1123
Joined: November 19th, 2014, 3:53 pm

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by arsebiscuits1 »

I bet Sarries are really regretting not attending the Cup Launch now....
He's gotten awfully fond of that brick
heno
Knowledgeable
Posts: 444
Joined: April 3rd, 2007, 1:54 pm

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by heno »

Oldschool wrote:Eh lads before we get too precious, I seem to remember that we brought a player to SA whom we then had to fly home, sort out the visa and fly back out again.
I also seem to recall that we had a problem with another foreign player who we simply failed to register for the HEC.
One was from NZ and the other an Argie.
As for Saracens, good luck with that. :wink:
We didn't field them though.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
User avatar
Dave Cahill
Devin Toner
Posts: 25501
Joined: January 24th, 2006, 3:32 pm
Location: None of your damn business
Contact:

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by Dave Cahill »

The great thing about Saracens is that they when they sh!t the bed, they use an agricultural muck spreader to do so to make sure absolutely everything is evenly covered in kaka
I have Bumbleflex
User avatar
MylesNaGapoleen
Rhys Ruddock
Posts: 2134
Joined: September 18th, 2009, 11:04 am

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by MylesNaGapoleen »

Dave Cahill wrote:The great thing about Saracens is that they when they sh!t the bed, they use an agricultural muck spreader to do so to make sure absolutely everything is evenly covered in kaka
Image
User avatar
Twist
Rhys Ruddock
Posts: 2128
Joined: September 14th, 2011, 2:33 am

Re: Leinster v Salarysins

Post by Twist »

Oldschool wrote:Eh lads before we get too precious, I seem to remember that we brought a player to SA whom we then had to fly home, sort out the visa and fly back out again.
I also seem to recall that we had a problem with another foreign player who we simply failed to register for the HEC.
One was from NZ and the other an Argie.
As for Saracens, good luck with that. :wink:
We didn't play them though. And if we did we'd have been open to punishment just like Saracens appear to be now
Post Reply